# WHAT HAPPENS WHEN TEACHERS AND STUDENTS ARE INTRODUCED TO MATHEMATICAL INVESTIGATIONS: AN EXPLORATORY STUDY

## Abstract

A mathematical investigation (MI) encapsulates the reform movement in mathematics education by addressing content and process simultaneously and providing a novel opportunity for students to develop thinking skills and good mental habits. However, introducing MI to teachers and students who are used to routinized teaching approaches and pen-and-paper testing presents many challenges. This study introduced MI to two junior classes and the mathematics teachers of a regular public high school. After the MI orientation workshops, the students engaged in the processes of pattern-finding, problem posing, conjecturing, verifying, and proving. Data were gathered through focus group discussions, interviews, observations, teachers’ reflection notes, audiotapes, and analysis of students’ outputs. The challenges of doing MI included the teachers’ and students’ lack of exposure to and/or competence in the investigative processes, the teacher’s traditional views and teaching practices, and some sociosystemic factors in schools. Issues raised here could give insights into the areas where teachers and students needed reinforcement and how teachers could redesign mathematics instruction to focus on the development of processes and thinking skills needed for investigations.

** **

## References

Bastow, B., Hughes, J., Kissane, B. & Mortlock, R.(1984). 40 Mathematical Investigations. The Mathematical Association of Western Australia: Nedlands, WA.

Burke, K. (1999). The mindful school: How to assess authentic learning (3rd Ed). Illinois: SkyLight Professional Development.

Department of Education (2016). K to 12 mathematics curriculum (August 2016 version). Retrieved October 1, 2016 from http://www.deped.gov.ph/sites/default/files/order/2015/DO_s2015_08.pdf

Diezmann, C. M., Watters, J. J. and English, L. D (2001). Implementing mathematical investigations with young children . In Proceedings 24th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, pages 170-177, Sydney. Downloaded from http://eprints.qut.edu.au/1505/1/1505.pdf.

Ernest, P. (1991). The philosophy of mathematics education: Studies in mathematics education. London: The Falmer Press.

Jaworski, B (1994). Investigating Mathematics Teaching: A constructivist enquiry. London: The Falmer Press.

Jaworski, B. (2004). Grappling with complexity: Cp-learning in inquiry communities in mathematics teaching development. Proceedings of the 28th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Vol. 1, pp. 17 – 36.

Marshman, M., Clark, D. & Carey, M. (April 2015). The use of mathematical investigations in a queensland primary school and implications for professional development. International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning: online journal available at http://www.cimt.plymouth.ac.uk/journal.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1995). Assessment standards for school mathematics. Reston: VA.

Nivera, G. (2012). Mathematical investigations and its assessment: Implications to teaching and learning. The Normal Lights Journal on Teacher Education, 6 (1), pp. 56 -66.

Orton, A. & Frobisher,L. (2005). Insights into teaching mathematics. London: Continuum.

Pólya, G. (1945). How to solve it: A new aspect of the mathematical method. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Ponte, J. P., Segurado, M.I. & Oliviera, H. (2003). A collaborative project using narratives: What happens when pupils work on mathematical investigations. In A. Peter-Koop, V. Santos-Wagner, C. Breen & A. Begg (Eds.), Collaboration in teacher education: Examples from the context of mathematics education (pp. 85 – 97). Dordrecht:Kluwer.

Ronda, E. (2005). Mathematical investigations. Hand-outs given during the Facilitators Training in Science and Mathematical Investigations. Diliman, Quezon City: UP NISMED.

Ronda, E. (2010). What is mathematical investigations? Retrieved on April 3, 2015 from http://math4teaching.com/2010/03/09/what-is-mathematical-investigation/.

Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense making in mathematics. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 334-370). New York: Macmillan.

Steffy, B. (1995). Authentic assessment and curriculum alignment. Massachusetts: Pro-Active Publications.

Tobin, K. & Tippins, D. (1993). Constructivism as a referent for teaching and learning. In K. Tobin (Ed.), The practice of constructivism in science education (or TPCSE, pp. 3-21).

Waters, J. (2016). Phenomenological research guidelines. Capillano University. Retrieved January 5, 2016 from https://www.capilanou.ca/psychology/student-resources/research-guidelines/Phenomenological-Research-Guidelines/

Yeo, J. B. W., & Yeap, B. H. (2010). Characterising the cognitive processes in mathematical investigation. International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning: online journal available at http://www.cimt.plymouth.ac.uk/journal.